An independent framework to evaluate the impact of Citizens’ Assemblies across North America.

Learning Series

Illustration of a red shape with an animated face jumping on the step of a beige shape in the form of a stair. The stair also has a face that is animated, the two shape together symbolise a constant learning.

An independent framework to evaluate the impact of Citizens’ Assemblies across North America.

Using surveys, observations, and interviews, we gather evidence from assemblies to understand what works — and why. These case studies uncover practical lessons on design, participation, and impact, helping governments and practitioners strengthen deliberative processes.

Together with the Institute for Democratic Engagement and Accountability (IDEA), we have brought together an international team of researchers and practitioners to document, analyze, and share what makes Citizens’ Assemblies effective, inclusive, and trusted.

Our methodology
Meet the team

Upcoming Case Studies

  • In March 2026, CivicLex hosted Lexington’s first-ever Civic Assembly on how changes to council compensation and how often the Charter is reviewed could improve representation, trust, & participation in our local government.

    Ken Docekal is our lead evaluator.

    Project website

  • We provided advice to Unify America on the assembly design in Akron and will conduct an independent evaluation of the process.

    Darlene Moorman is our lead evaluator.

    Project website

  • The Snohomish County Civic Assembly brought together a group of randomly selected residents to deliberate on the future of AI use in Snohomish County government.

    We advised Civic Genius on the assembly design and carried out an independent evaluation of the process.

    Project website